Nature vs Nurture Essay -- essays research papers

disposition or Nurture?The Determination of Human doingsThe nature versus hold up debate has spanned over decades, and is becoming moreheated in the new-fangled years. Following the mapping of the mankind genome, scientists argon pursuingthe possibility of coercive human behaviour such as homicidal tendencies or dementia throughthe manipulation of genes. Is this possible for us to ensure that humans exculpate in sure waysunder certain circumstances in future? This is highly doubtful, as the determination of human behaviour depends non only ongenes (nature), precisely as well as on the environment (nurture). It is normally the joint product of genes andenvironment, champion of the first principles in Leda Cosmides and jakes Tooby in EvolutionaryPsychology Nature and Nurture (attached). This remains our assemblages thesis. Introduction Take for example this Calvin and Hobbes strip. We assume that duplication is the identical as cloning and therefore the two Calvins ar egenetically similar. Hobbes (that is the tiger) implies in the last frame that the two are similar inbehaviour. Ignoring the absurdity, it brings us to a question Do genetically similar people fare the same way? That is, tail assembly nature all determine how one behaves?This seems quite impossible. Take a nonher fictitious, but thought-provoking, example inMowgli, from The hobo camp Book by Rudyard Kipling. He is genetically similar to all humanbeings and much less so to wolves, bears and panthers, but he behave more like the wildanimals. In this case, it is certainly clear that nature alone cannot determine human nature. Theenvironment makes a difference. Behaviour geneticsBehaviour genetics is the study of the extent to which heredity (genes) influence humanbehaviour. Genes are put in chromosomes which are made up of deoxyribonucleic acid( deoxyribonucleic acid). Our DNA strand determines not only our physical characteristics (known to soem as ourgenetic architecture) but als o our psychological make up. The human genome project hasisolated certain genes trustworthy for certain behaviour traits. For example dopamine isresponsible for risk-seeking behaviour, as well as hyperactivity (The Economist June 1st).Although the probability of altering genetic square up and therefore human behaviour is... ...nbspThe effects of the environment also does not explain why some traits runs in the family.Charles Darwin, father of behaviour genetics, say in 1872 that a gentleman had a habit ofraising his lace in front of his face when sleeping and dropping it with a riff hence hitting hisnose (Darwin, C. The expression of the emotions in man and animals) This is an erratictrait. However, years after his death, his son and daughter are also comprise with the same trait.Environment cannot give a suitable explanation for this trait. It also does not explain howidentical twins who grow up apart(predicate) can have the same behaviourism and why while biologicalchildr en tend to behave like their parents whereas most adopted children do not. (As found bythe twin study and adopted study of University of Lousiana ) ConclusionTherefore, it can be concluded that neither nature and nurture is exclusively responsiblefor determining human behaviour. Although genes contribute to our physical characteristics(some of which affects our behaviour) and our psychological frame of mind, our love andeducation are also important in determining who and what we are.